Killer Bean is back!
The earlier version totally blew me away (back in college). This is even better.
The earlier version totally blew me away (back in college). This is even better.
Posted by
takchek
at
2:08 PM
0
comments
Labels: flying, fun, quotable quotes
Someone stuck this bumper sticker to the lab door's window:
Dear colleagues,
In order to keep our synthetic chemistry skills sharp, Dr. X is going to start a mechanism club. The point is to broaden our synthesis knowledge through mechanisms. It will be an informal thing, and we will try to make it fun. If necessary, we may even lure you with beer.
Several of you have already expressed interest, and I would like to invite all of you to join. It seems that Wednesday evening would be a good day/time, but I encourage input from all of you. Please let me know if you are interested, and if Wed. evening would work for you (of course I'm not talking about tomorrow). I know that there are people that I forgot to include, so feel free to tell your coworkers.
Thanks,
Posted by
takchek
at
4:35 PM
0
comments
Labels: chemistry, fun, grad school, research
One of the new grad students in my current group has the same last name as a former US president (from the 20th century, now deceased), although I am not sure if they are related. There might be a chance though, given that she attended the same highly selective university (for undergrad) as him, hailed from the same state, and that the surname is quite rare in this country.
No Secret Service agents hanging around though, and I doubt federal protection will cover the great-grandchildren.
Hmm...I will ask soon, once I get an opportunity to do so.
Edit (9.30pm): Turns out she is not.
Posted by
takchek
at
12:47 PM
0
comments
Labels: fun, grad school, us
Over the Halloween weekend:
A friend was running this life/death assay on (some mammalian) cells. Cells which are dead will stain red; live ones will stain green. Then what she got was two sets of cells - one group staining both red and green, and the other doesn't stain at all.
We called the first set the living dead, and the second the ghosts.
Later she found out that she didn't add enough of the fluorescent dye.
Posted by
takchek
at
2:00 PM
2
comments
Labels: fun, grad school, research
Tonya Coffey and her students reported "an experimental study of the Diet Coke and Mentos reaction (made famous in a 2006 Mythbusters episode), and consider(ed) many aspects of the reaction, including the ingredients in the candy and soda, the roughness of the candy, the temperature of the soda, and the duration of the reaction." (Am. J. Phys., 2008, 76(6), 551 - 557)
Basically,
1. The Mythbusters correctly identified potassium benzoate and aspartame as key ingredients in the Diet Coke–Mentos reaction. (Static water) Contact angle measurements were used to show that these ingredients reduce the work required for bubble formation, allowing carbon dioxide to rapidly escape from the soda. The small amount of caffeine in Diet Coke is unlikely to contribute significantly to the reaction.
2. The Mythbusters also correctly identified the roughness of the samples as one of the main causes of the reaction. The importance of sample roughness was shown by comparing SEM and AFM images of the samples to the explosive power of the reaction. Increased surface roughness implies a higher surface area to volume ratio, meaning that more growth sites should be present on per unit volume.
3. Samples which encounter less viscous drag and hence fall more quickly through the soda will cause a more explosive reaction. Also, for the same amount of mass lost, the eruption will be more dramatic when the reaction takes place over a shorter time.
4. Finally, hotter beverages result in a more explosive reaction. (A direct illustration of Henry's law and Le Chatelier's Principle)
This guy rocks! Three of his classic jokes:
a. Some helium gas drifts into a bar. The bartender says, 'We don't serve noble gases here.' Pause. The helium doesn't react.
b. Says the bartender to a superconductor that walks in: 'We don't serve superconductors here.' The superconductor then leaves the bar, putting up no resistance.
c. Women have passed through my life like exotic particles through a cloud chamber, leaving only vapor trails for me to study for clues to their nature.
Posted by
takchek
at
10:21 PM
1 comments
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Rogers Indicator of Multiple Intelligences created with QuizFarm.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You scored as Logical/Mathematical You like to work with numbers and ask questions. You learn best by classifying information, engaging in abstract thinking and looking for common basic principles. People like you include mathematicians, biologists, medical technicians, geologists, engineers, physicists, researchers and other scientists.
|
Posted by
takchek
at
9:57 AM
0
comments
Labels: fun
Over the weekend, we were in a car driving towards our St. Patrick's Day destination. A fellow passenger (AP) was describing her recipe for baking chocolate muffins. I asked her about the type of chocolate that she used.
AP: No, it's not chocolate powder. It's like those you see coated on donuts in Singapore.
tk: Oh, you meant like nano-rods.
AP: OMG, you are so geeky! It's called chocolate rice, duh.

Posted by
takchek
at
10:31 AM
2
comments
My results and the website's comments (not surprising):
Your Score: Pure Nerd
78 % Nerd, 43% Geek, 43% Dork
For The Record:
A Nerd is someone who is passionate about learning/being smart/academia.
A Geek is someone who is passionate about some particular area or subject, often an obscure or difficult one.
A Dork is someone who has difficulty with common social expectations/interactions.
You scored better than half in Nerd, earning you the title of: Pure Nerd.
The times, they are a-changing. It used to be that being exceptionally smart led to being unpopular, which would ultimately lead to picking up all of the traits and tendences associated with the "dork." No-longer. Being smart isn't as socially crippling as it once was, and even more so as you get older: eventually being a Pure Nerd will likely be replaced with the following label: Purely Successful.
Congratulations!


Posted by
takchek
at
6:49 PM
2
comments
Friends from the company came over to my place for dinner and (board) games last night. We played 'Taboo' and 'Cranium'.
Taboo:
When it was my turn, one of the words I picked was 'saddle'. I couldn't say 'horse' or 'riding', and so I tried to lead my group by saying..."When you have y = x^3, what is the point at (0,0) called? Or the valley between two peaks in a 3D plot?"
They looked at me blankly. Then the time was up.
"It's a saddle point!"
"OMG, you are such a nerd!"
This came from a group of fellow engineers. Everyone started laughing.
Posted by
takchek
at
10:27 AM
4
comments