This is probably one of the best speeches I have heard so far from a University president.
Succinct and biting.
Unfortunately, his guest came out a dud. With remarks like:
“In Iran, we don’t have homosexuals like in your country. We don’t have that in our country.”
Maybe he's right; maybe he has killed or imprisoned them all.
A friend of mine (in grad school) has just ended her relationship with her SO. He is now working in Sg, as part of his scholarship bond. Their last 3 years together were in the form of a LDR.
They had met while as undergrads in one of the Ivy schools.
should or should not be.
*Quah Sy Ren is an Associate Prof and the deputy Head of NTU's Division of Chinese.
From Post War; A History of Europe Since 1945 by Tony Judt (pp 757):
To one side stood a sophisticated elite of Europeans: men and women, typically young, widely traveled and well-educated, who might have studied in two or even three different universities across the continent. Their qualifications and professions allowed them to find work anywhere across the European Union: from Copenhagen to Dublin, from Barcelona to Frankfurt. High incomes, low airfares, open frontiers and an integrated rail network favored easy and frequent mobility. For the purposes of consumption, leisure and entertainment as well as employment this new class of Europeans traveled with confident ease across their continent - communicating, like medieval clercs wandering between Bologna, Salamanca and Oxford, in a cosmopolitan lingua franca: then Latin, now English.
On the other side of the divide were to be found those - still the overwhelming majority - who could not be part of this brave new continent or else did not (yet?) choose to join: millions of Europeans whose lack of skills, education, training, opportunity or means kept them firmly rooted where they were. These men and women, the villeins in Europe's new medieval landscape, could not so readily benefit from the EU's single market in goods, services and labor. Instead they remain bound to their country or their local community, constrained by unfamiliarity with distant possibilities and foreign tongues and often far more hostile to 'Europe' than their cosmopolitan fellow citizens.
...There had always been men (and mostly men) who traveled to distant countries to find work: ignorant of foreign languages, regarded with hostile suspicion by their hosts and in any case intent upon returning home with their carefully earned savings. (They) were not likely to be found dining out in Brussels, vacationing in Italy or shopping in London...
I spent quite a bit of time these past nights going through my friends-list in friendster, facebook and linkedin. I got to know (or was reminded) of where they did their college (and graduate work for some), what jobs they have now, their marital status and kids (if any).
I have also reconnected with a few I had lost contact - including one (a crush from Dunman) for almost 15 years.
I must say I am impressed.
Found this from -ben.
I love going to libraries. The joy of being surrounded by shelves of books, of various genres, and modifying Forrest's quote: "Life is like a box of chocolates library of books; you never know what you gonna get". The surprise and exhilaration of randomly picking up one which you like; thumbing your fingers through each and every page, savoring the words in your mind as one would to a glass of vintage wine as they bring you to another world...
One could spend a lifetime in these hallowed halls. -ben
Indeed!
I love Georgetown's Rigg library. I did a double take when I visited the campus during one spring break, literally gawking through the door window.
Friends from the company came over to my place for dinner and (board) games last night. We played 'Taboo' and 'Cranium'.
Taboo:
When it was my turn, one of the words I picked was 'saddle'. I couldn't say 'horse' or 'riding', and so I tried to lead my group by saying..."When you have y = x^3, what is the point at (0,0) called? Or the valley between two peaks in a 3D plot?"
They looked at me blankly. Then the time was up.
"It's a saddle point!"
"OMG, you are such a nerd!"
This came from a group of fellow engineers. Everyone started laughing.
Saw this pic on the MOB's blog.
I am actually ambivalent in this 'local' vs 'foreign' debate. I believe free trade works for the benefit of all, although some of the poorer/low-skilled segments of society are made worse off with globalization and the free movement of goods/services and labor across borders.
Some jobs may be lost, but new ones will be created. It is not a zero-sum game.
Then again what do I know. I am just a beneficiary of the present system - without which I would not be able to 'export' myself, my skill-sets and become a 'foreign-born' professional in the USA. (I might also add - as well as a significant proportion of my readers now working outside of Singapore. You know I know who you are.)
A related old post by Greg Mankiw. What he said: "I thought the readers of this blog--an elite group--might enjoy it." sounds so wrong. Heh.
